Price: $5.01

Quantity in stock: 5

Seller rating: rated 4.9 out of 5  (911 Customer Ratings)

Casio Cinch Sack

rated 2.5 out of 5  (26 Casio Cinch Sack Reviews)


List Price: $10.00
Your Price: $5.01  -- saving you 50 percent

Usually ships in 1-2 business days


Product Details

Model: CinchSack

Manufacturer: Casio

Model SKU: B002ECFIRC


Casio Cinch Sack Reviews

rated 4 out of 5 Does well for the price it has
by Liviu Inasel , 2010-03-09


For the price it has, it is an excellent product. If you plan for heavy duty utilization, then forget it. For light stuff...it is good.



rated 5 out of 5 Nice lightweight cinch sack
by S. Sadler from Santa Barbara, CA, 2010-02-05


I like the zipper pocket on the outside for keys, phone, etc. The sack is useful for many taks with its nylon material and good storage space.



rated 1 out of 5 Junk
by Ronald Boyd from Knoxville, TN, 2010-02-01


Glad it was free with my order. I would have been really mad if I had have paid the $10 asking price. Needs to be $1. JUNK!



rated 1 out of 5 Casio Cinch Sack
by Jay from New York, NY United States, 2010-01-31


This product is next to useless. I first carried a newspaper, magazine, paperback book, and a bottle of water and carried the sack on my back with the strings looped through both my arms. After a week, the grommet holding one set of strings broke through the thin material. I then carried the sack over one should using hte other set of strings and after the second week, the second grommet ripped though the material. Maybe if you only carry a newspaper, it will work. My wife has a cinch sack that has ballistic nylon on the front, where the two grommets are attached. She's been using hers for a year without a problem. Bottom line, I wouldn't recommend any cinch scak that doesn't have ballistic nylon to reinforce the grommets that hold the draw strings.



rated 3 out of 5 Useless but heck it's free
by Mike Gorge from Durham, NC United States, 2010-01-04


Like many have said in the reviews. It is useless but heck it's free....would be nicer/more functional without the ghastly logo though